Comparison
Muse Code vs Pi
Helicon is a free, MIT licensed client for Meta's Muse Code CLI. It has no agent of its own, so the real choice is Muse Code or Pi, a minimal open source terminal agent from Earendil. Choose Pi for one customizable agent across many model providers. Choose Muse Code if you already pay for it and want its sessions in a window.
Last updated · Markdown version
At a glance
| Helicon | Pi | Checked | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who ships it | Community, unofficial, not affiliated with Meta | Earendil Inc. (site). Mario Zechner (repo licence and npm author) | 20 October 2026 |
| License | MIT | MIT, per its GitHub repository | 20 October 2026 |
| Sign-in and billing | Free. Uses your own muse login: a Muse Code plan, or pay-as-you-go billing on Meta's Model API | Run /login inside Pi to connect a subscription or an API key | 20 October 2026 |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, the web and a VS Code extension | Installers for macOS, Linux and Windows. Needs Node.js 22.19 or newer, which the installers can set up | 20 October 2026 |
| Interface | Session window with inline diffs and a file viewer | Interactive terminal UI. Also print and JSON modes, RPC and an SDK | 20 October 2026 |
| Sub-agents and plan mode | Controls for Muse Code subagents and workflows | Skipped by default. You add them with extensions or packages | 20 October 2026 |
| Price of the tool | Free, no paid tier | Free and MIT licensed. No paid tier is listed on pi.dev or its GitHub repository (checked 20 Oct 2026) |
What each one is
This page compares Pi, the coding agent from Earendil at pi.dev. Pi describes itself as a minimal agent harness. You customize it with extensions, skills, prompt templates and themes. It runs in a terminal, in scripts, over RPC, or inside your own app through its SDK.
Muse Code is Meta's coding CLI. Helicon is a free, MIT licensed desktop and web client for it. It is community built and not affiliated with Meta. Helicon uses your own muse login and your own Muse Code subscription, and it is not a separate agent.
Where they actually differ
Window or terminal
Pi's main interface is a terminal UI, with a session tree you move around by command. Helicon is a window for Muse Code sessions. It lists sessions across projects, shows diffs inline, and lets you resume a past session.
Models
Pi lets you switch between providers and models mid-session. Its site names Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, Ollama and others. Helicon works with Muse Code through the muse CLI and does not set up a model of its own.
How you customize it
Pi's pitch is that you change the agent itself with TypeScript extensions, skills and shareable packages. Helicon is a client. You can read and change its source, which is MIT licensed, but it does not change how Muse Code behaves.
Cost
Helicon costs nothing. You pay Meta for Muse Code, through your own plan or pay-as-you-go billing on Meta's Model API. Pi is free and MIT licensed, and no paid tier is listed on pi.dev or its repository. What you pay depends on the provider you connect.
Choose the Pi coding agent if
- You want one agent that works across many model providers, and you want to switch models mid-session.
- You want to shape the agent with extensions, skills and prompt templates instead of using it as shipped.
- You want to embed an agent in your own app through Pi's RPC mode or SDK.
- You prefer a minimal terminal tool and are happy to add features like plan mode yourself.
Choose Helicon if
- You already pay for Muse Code and want its sessions in a window.
- You want approvals and inline diffs shown in each thread.
- You want a free, MIT licensed client with no account.
- You want one UI that also runs in a browser against a remote daemon.
Can you use both?
You can open both on the same project folder. Use Pi in a terminal for one task and Helicon for Muse Code threads, with their history and approvals. They are separate agents with separate sessions, so neither sees the other's history.
Helicon is one Muse Code GUI of several, and that page lists the rest. Helicon is free and MIT licensed, and you can try Helicon in your browser on sample data before you install anything.
Frequently asked questions
What is Pi?
Pi is an open source coding agent from Earendil, described on pi.dev as a minimal agent harness. It runs in a terminal and can also be driven over RPC or embedded through its SDK.
Is Pi free?
Yes. Pi is MIT licensed, and neither pi.dev nor its GitHub repository lists a paid tier. The model provider you connect may charge you.
Can Helicon run Pi?
No. Helicon is a Muse Code Session Protocol client. It drives the muse CLI and nothing else.
Is Helicon official?
No. It is an unofficial community project, MIT licensed, and not made, sponsored or endorsed by Meta.
Keep reading
- Muse Code GUIYes, Muse Code has graphical interfaces. A standalone desktop and web app, VS Code extensions, ACP editor bridges and other open-source wrappers, compared honestly.
- PaseoPaseo runs many coding agents, Muse Code included, from desktop, web and mobile. Helicon is built only for Muse Code. What differs, and when the plain CLI is enough.
- Other Muse GUIsAn honest look at the small field of Muse Code GUI wrappers, what separates them, and the specific things to check before trusting any client with shell access.
- The muse terminalHow a Muse Code GUI differs from the muse CLI terminal interface: session history, inline diffs, approvals and cost, side by side with what the TUI already does well.
- VS Code extensionsA standalone Muse Code desktop app compared with running the muse CLI inside VS Code: where an editor panel wins, where a separate session home wins, and how to run both.
- Zed with ACPRunning Muse Code inside Zed through an Agent Client Protocol bridge, compared with a standalone Muse Code desktop app. Editor native versus session native.
Same Muse Code. Same subscription. Better interface.
Free and MIT licensed. Windows installer, universal macOS DMG, and a web build against a daemon you run.