Comparison
Muse Code vs Antigravity
Helicon does not run its own agent. It is a free, MIT licensed client for Meta's Muse Code CLI, so the real choice is Muse Code, in Helicon or a terminal, against Google's Antigravity IDE. Choose Antigravity if you want an editor with an agent built in. Choose Muse Code if you already pay for it and want its sessions in a window.
Last updated · Markdown version
At a glance
| Helicon | Antigravity | Checked | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who ships it | Community, unofficial, not affiliated with Meta | 20 October 2026 | |
| License | MIT | Not stated on the pages checked | |
| Price | Free. Needs your own Muse Code plan, or pay-as-you-go billing on Meta's Model API | Available at no charge for developers | 20 October 2026 |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, the web and a VS Code extension | macOS, Windows, Linux and Googlebook | 20 October 2026 |
| Editor | Session window with inline diffs and a file viewer | Full IDE with a code editor and tab autocompletion | 20 October 2026 |
| Review of agent work | Inline diffs and approvals | Artifacts, so you manage higher level tasks rather than single tool calls | 20 October 2026 |
| Terminal | Runs on the muse CLI from Meta | Separate Antigravity CLI, installed by script | 20 October 2026 |
What each one is
This page compares the Antigravity IDE. Google describes Antigravity as its agentic development platform, and the IDE is a fully featured AI-powered editor with tab autocompletion, commands and agents. Google also ships an Antigravity App, a separate Antigravity CLI and an SDK. This page does not compare those.
Muse Code is Meta's coding CLI. Helicon is a free, MIT licensed desktop and web client for it. It is community built and not affiliated with Meta. Helicon uses your own muse login and your own Muse Code subscription, and it is not a separate agent.
Where they actually differ
Editor or session window
Antigravity is an IDE with a code editor. Helicon is a window for Muse Code sessions. It shows the files an agent touched in a viewer beside the conversation.
Where the agent works
In Antigravity, the agent works across the editor, terminal and browser. Helicon drives the Muse Code CLI in your project.
Cost
Helicon costs nothing. Your Muse Code subscription is the only bill. Google says Antigravity is available at no charge for developers.
Openness
Helicon is MIT licensed and its source is public. The Antigravity pages checked do not state a license.
Choose the Google Antigravity IDE if
- You want an editor and an agent in one Google app.
- You want tab autocompletion while you type.
- You do not have a Muse Code subscription.
- You want the agent to work in a browser as well as the editor and terminal.
Choose Helicon if
- You already pay for Muse Code and want its sessions in a window.
- You want approvals and inline diffs shown in each thread.
- You want a free, MIT licensed client with no account.
- You want one UI that also runs in a browser against a remote daemon.
Can you use both?
You can open both on the same project folder. Use the Antigravity editor for hand edits and Helicon for Muse Code threads, with their history and approvals.
Helicon is one Muse Code GUI of several, and that page lists the rest. Helicon is free and MIT licensed, and you can try Helicon in your browser on sample data before you install anything.
Frequently asked questions
Which Antigravity product does this page compare?
The Antigravity IDE from Google. Google also ships an Antigravity App, a separate Antigravity CLI and an SDK. This page does not cover those.
Is Antigravity free?
Google says Antigravity is available at no charge for developers. Check Google's own pricing for current limits.
Does Helicon replace the muse CLI?
No. Helicon requires the muse CLI, signed in with your own muse login. It drives the CLI and does not replace it.
Is Helicon official?
No. It is an unofficial community project, MIT licensed, and not made, sponsored or endorsed by Meta.
Keep reading
- Muse Code GUIYes, Muse Code has graphical interfaces. A standalone desktop and web app, VS Code extensions, ACP editor bridges and other open-source wrappers, compared honestly.
- Grok BuildMuse Code vs Grok Build, xAI's terminal coding agent. Helicon is a free Muse Code client, so this page says what differs and which one fits your work.
- Other Muse GUIsAn honest look at the small field of Muse Code GUI wrappers, what separates them, and the specific things to check before trusting any client with shell access.
- The muse terminalHow a Muse Code GUI differs from the muse CLI terminal interface: session history, inline diffs, approvals and cost, side by side with what the TUI already does well.
- VS Code extensionsA standalone Muse Code desktop app compared with running the muse CLI inside VS Code: where an editor panel wins, where a separate session home wins, and how to run both.
- Zed with ACPRunning Muse Code inside Zed through an Agent Client Protocol bridge, compared with a standalone Muse Code desktop app. Editor native versus session native.
Same Muse Code. Same subscription. Better interface.
Free and MIT licensed. Windows installer, universal macOS DMG, and a web build against a daemon you run.